Process Map and Process Descriptions: showing your company on one page
What this course is about
You have already started this course.
What this course does not cover (expand)
What clause 4.4 requires: determine processes — and know eight things per process
Process-oriented means: the company is not described by departments or by clauses of the standard, but by the flows that turn an input (enquiry, material, need) into an output (quotation, product, invoice). Clause 4.4.1 requires these processes to be determined and eight things to be defined per process:
| 4.4.1 | Requirement | In the process sheet |
|---|---|---|
| a) | Inputs and outputs | Fields “Input” and “Output” |
| b) | Sequence and interaction | Process map (arrows) + step table |
| c) | Criteria and methods, KPIs | Field “KPI” |
| d) | Resources | Field “With what” (equipment, software, people) |
| e) | Responsibilities and authorities | Field “Process owner” |
| f) | Risks and opportunities | Reference to the risk analysis (rows per process) |
| g) | Evaluation | KPI in the management review |
| h) | Improvement | Actions from audit/review |
Under 4.4.2, only what the company needs to support its processes must be documented, plus the records. Process map and process sheets are the usual form — one process sheet per process, one page.
What a process is — and what it is not:
| Process | Not a process (but …) |
|---|---|
| Order handling from enquiry to invoice | “Sales” (department) |
| Purchasing and goods receipt | “Place order” (activity) |
| Internal audit | “Clause 9.2” (clause of the standard) |
| Complaint handling | “Quality” (goal) |
ISO 9001:2026 leaves 4.4 unchanged in content and links it more closely to risks and opportunities (6.1, separately) and to planning of changes (6.3) — anyone who knows risks and KPI per process meets both.
The map on one page: management, value creation, support
The map has three bands and reads from left to right:
| Band | Question | Standard processes (library) |
|---|---|---|
| Management (top) | Who steers? | M1 Management review · M2 Risks and opportunities · M3 Internal audit · M4 Action tracking · M5 Training/competence |
| Value creation (middle, customer → customer) | How do we earn money? | V1 Order handling (enquiry to invoice) · V2 Production/service provision · if applicable V3 Development, V4 Service/maintenance |
| Support (bottom) | What keeps it running? | S1 Purchasing · S2 Goods receipt · S3 Customer satisfaction · S4 Complaints · S5 Supplier evaluation · S6 Maintenance/infrastructure · S7 Measuring equipment · S8 Documentation |
On the left is “Customer: requirement”, on the right “Customer: satisfaction” — the value creation band connects the two. Arrows only for the main interfaces (enquiry → V1, V1 → V2, S1/S2 → V2, V2 → customer, S4 → M4). More arrows do not make the map more precise, only illegible.
Rules: one page · legible from one metre (notice board) · processes with number and name, no clause of the standard on it · every process has exactly one sheet · every process has exactly one owner.
Leave out processes that do not apply: no measuring equipment, no S7; no development, no V3; no warehouse, no S2 as a separate process (then part of S1). A company with three employees has seven processes, not twelve.
Typical mistakes: departments as processes (“office”, “workshop”) · 25 boxes because every activity became a process · occupational safety as a QM process (does not belong) · map taken from a template set with processes the company does not have · arrows between everything and everyone.
📄 Map template in PowerPoint to adapt (three bands, boxes, arrows)
Industry templates: manufacturing, trades/construction, trade, services/IT
| Industry | Value creation (middle) | Typical support | Usually dropped |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing / metal / plastics | V1 Order (enquiry–order confirmation) · V2 Work preparation and production · V3 Inspection and shipping · if applicable V4 Development | S1 Purchasing, S2 Goods receipt, S5 Suppliers, S6 Maintenance, S7 Measuring equipment, S4 Complaints | – |
| Trades / construction / installation | V1 Survey and quotation · V2 Order and planning · V3 Execution/site · V4 Acceptance and invoice | S1 Purchasing, S6 Vehicles/tools, S4 Complaints/defects, S5 Subcontractors | S7 Measuring equipment (often), S2 Goods receipt as a separate process |
| Trade / logistics | V1 Procurement and range · V2 Warehouse and picking · V3 Sales and shipping · if applicable V4 Installation/service | S1 Suppliers (large), S4 Returns/complaints, S6 Fleet/warehouse | S7 Measuring equipment, V Development |
| Services / IT / consulting | V1 Enquiry and quotation · V2 Project/service · V3 Service/ticket · if applicable V4 Operation (cloud, maintenance contract) | S1 Purchasing (software, licences), S5 Suppliers (providers), S8 Data backup/IT, S4 Complaints | S2, S7; S6 becomes IT infrastructure |
Adaptation path in 30 minutes: (1) Take the industry template. (2) Adapt each value creation process to your own words (“ticket” instead of “service”, “site” instead of “execution”). (3) Delete processes that do not exist — without replacement. (4) Enter one owner per process from the organisation chart (function). (5) Go through it with management in ten minutes: “Is anything missing that we earn money with?”
How to recognise a good template: management recognises its own company without anyone explaining what a process is.
The process sheet: one page per process with turtle logic
The turtle asks six questions of a process: What comes in? What goes out? With what (equipment, software)? Who (competence)? How (instructions, methods)? How well (KPI)? You do not have to draw it as a turtle — the fields of the process sheet are the same:
| Field | Content | Example V1 order handling |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose (one sentence) | Why does the process exist? | Every enquiry becomes an order that is on time, complete and paid. |
| Process owner | one function | Head of sales |
| Input | what triggers the process | Enquiry (e-mail, phone, portal), customer order |
| Output | what comes out | Quotation, order confirmation, delivered product, invoice |
| Steps (table) | Step – who – how/with what – record | 1 Record enquiry – sales – ERP – enquiry number … 8 Invoice – administration – ERP – invoice |
| With what (resources) | equipment, software, rooms, people | ERP, CAD, costing template, 2 sales staff |
| KPI | one, at most two, with target | On-time delivery ≥ 95 %; quotation hit rate |
| Risks/opportunities | reference | Risk analysis rows V1-1 to V1-3 |
| Related documents | instructions, forms | Procedure “Change to order”, form “Order file”, work instruction “Final inspection” |
Writing rules: one action verb per step · function instead of name · one record per step (otherwise the step cannot be checked in the audit) · what-to-do-if for the two most frequent deviations (customer changes, deadline at risk) · one page.
The step table is the heart: it is what the auditor walks along on the last order (“Show me step 4 for order 2026-131”). If the record is missing from the table, it is missing in the audit.
📄 Process sheet template (one page, all fields, step table) in Word
One process, one owner, one KPI
One owner per process — as a function, not as a name. Management may own M1, M2 and V1; the quality manager owns M3 and S8, but not value creation (otherwise in the audit they are responsible for everything and competent for nothing). The owner: maintains the process sheet, delivers the KPI for the management review, carries the actions from audits and complaints for their process, is the contact person in the audit.
One KPI per process — with target value, source and person measuring:
| Process | KPI (example) | Target | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| V1 Order | On-time delivery (deliveries on the confirmed date) | ≥ 95 % | ERP / delivery notes |
| V2 Production | Rework rate or first pass yield | ≤ 2 % | Defect tally sheet |
| V3 Service | Response time priority 1 met | ≥ 95 % | Ticket system |
| S1 Purchasing | Supplier on-time delivery | ≥ 90 % | Goods receipt |
| S4 Complaints | Complaint rate; lead time to closure | ≤ 1 %; ≤ 10 days | Complaint list |
| S3 Customer satisfaction | Average rating (grade) | ≤ 2.0 | Customer rating |
| M3 Audit | Actions completed on time | 100 % | Action plan |
| M5 Training | Training plan fulfilled | 100 % | Qualification matrix |
KPIs that nobody collects are no KPIs. Rule: the figure must come from something the company already has (ERP, ticket system, lists) — no new tally sheets.
Link: the KPIs of the process sheets are the rows in chapter 2 of the management review (“process performance”), the quality objectives (6.2) pick out two to four of them with an improvement target, the audit programme plans one audit per process. That is how everything hangs on the map.
Interfaces and interaction: where processes hand over — and where errors arise
Errors rarely arise within a process, but between two processes — at the handover. The standard calls this interaction; in practice it means: for every handover it is defined what is handed over, in what form and with which record.
| Handover | What | Form | Record | Typical error |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| V1 Sales → V2 Production | Order with all details | Order file / ERP order with mandatory fields | Order confirmation, routing card | Dimensions missing, drawing revision outdated |
| S1/S2 Purchasing → V2 | Material inspected | Goods receipt with inspection level | Delivery note with note | Uninspected goods in production |
| V2 → Shipping/customer | Released product | Final inspection, packaging | Inspection record, delivery note | Loaded without release |
| Customer → S4 Complaint | Complaint | Complaint form | Complaint number | Complaint “settled by phone”, no trace |
| M3 Audit → M4 Actions | Finding | Action plan | Entry with deadline | Finding in the report, nowhere else |
The interface table (one page, annex to the map) lists these handovers — it is the best preparation for the audit question “How do you ensure that production gets everything it needs?”
Swimlane diagram (lanes per function, steps as boxes, arrows as handovers) is worthwhile for processes with more than three functions involved — usually V1. For all others, the step table is enough. Anyone who uses swimlanes keeps them as an annex to the process sheet, not as a replacement (the table carries the records).
The map as the backbone: manual, risk analysis, audit programme, management review
Anyone who uses the process numbers consistently has a system that explains itself:
| Document | Relation to the map |
|---|---|
| Manual chapter 6 | One process sheet per box, in the order of the map (M, V, S) |
| Risk and opportunity analysis | Column “process” — every row belongs to a process; the owner carries the action |
| Audit programme (3 years) | Rows = processes; every year all V processes, M/S alternating |
| Audit plan | Time blocks by process, interviewee = process owner |
| Management review chapter 2 | One row per process: KPI, target, actual, evaluation |
| Document list | Numbers of procedures/work instructions carry the process (WI-V2-04) or the column “process” |
| Qualification matrix | Columns = activities per process |
Changes to the map are changes under 6.3: new process (e.g. maintenance contracts as V4), outsourced process (contract manufacturing — stays on the map, marked “external, controlled via S5”), discontinued process. Change sheet, new map with status, manual chapter, audit programme adapted. Outsourced processes have a module of their own (next module).
Outsourced processes: contract manufacturing, haulage, cloud — on the map, not under the carpet
An outsourced process is a piece of your own value creation that someone else performs: painting, hardening, electroplating, haulage, subcontractors on the construction site, cloud operation of your own software. Not meant are the purchase of material or services outside value creation (tax adviser, cleaning, payroll) — these run through normal purchasing.
Three rules:
- On the map. The process is on the map, where it sits in the flow, marked “external” (dashed box or note). If it is missing, the auditor's first question is: “Where is the painting?” — and the finding on it is the third most frequent on 4.4.
- A short sheet. Half a page: what is outsourced, to whom (supplier class A), which specifications the supplier receives (drawing, coating thickness, delivery date), how it is inspected (goods receipt inspection level 2, sample, certificate), which records the supplier delivers (inspection certificate, delivery note with batch number), who is responsible (purchasing or foreman).
- Control under 8.4. Supplier marked in the supplier list as “outsourced process”, evaluated annually, complaints to them documented. The responsibility for the result stays in-house — that is the sentence the auditor wants to hear.
| Industry | Typically outsourced | Controlled via |
|---|---|---|
| Metal / plastics | Painting, hardening, electroplating, laser parts | Order with drawing, goods receipt inspection level 2, inspection certificate |
| Trades / construction | Subcontractors (electrical, screed), scaffolding | Subcontractor agreement, acceptance per service, records (measurement report) |
| Trade | Haulage, warehouse logistics | Supplier evaluation, transport damage rate, shipping check |
| Services / IT | Cloud hosting, subcontractors in the project | Contract with availability, acceptance of the partial service, data backup |
Borderline case haulage: anyone who has goods delivered by a haulier has outsourced the process “shipping to the customer” — it goes on the map (V band, “external”), controlled via supplier evaluation and shipping check. That costs one row and saves a finding.
The map in the audit: the eight questions on 4.4 — and the three most frequent findings
| No. | Auditor's question | Answer in two minutes |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | “Explain your company to me using the map.” | Management explains in three sentences: customer on the left, value creation in the middle, support, management |
| 2 | “Who is responsible for V2?” | Function in the process sheet; person in the organisation chart |
| 3 | “How do you know that V1 is running well?” | KPI with target and actual; row in the management review |
| 4 | “How does the order get from V1 to V2?” | Interface table; order file/ERP with mandatory fields |
| 5 | “You don't do the painting yourselves — where is that?” | Box “external” on the map; process sheet with control via S5/S2 |
| 6 | “What risk does V2 have?” | Risk analysis, rows V2-x |
| 7 | “What has changed in the processes in the last year?” | Map with status; change sheet; management review chapter 1 |
| 8 | (to the employee) “In which process do you work, and who is responsible for it?” | Employee names V2 and the foreman — the map is on the notice board |
The three most frequent findings: map taken from a template set with processes that do not exist (minor nonconformity 4.4, major for a core process) · process without owner or without KPI (minor nonconformity 4.4.1 c/e) · outsourced process missing from the map (minor nonconformity 4.4/8.4).
Five-minute check: map on the notice board and has a status · every process has a sheet with owner and KPI · KPIs are in the last management review · external processes marked · an employee can name their process.
Case study: Brenner & Son — draw the map, write two process sheets
Brenner & Son Specialist Supplies (fictitious; any resemblance to existing companies is coincidental): wholesale and specialist trade in fastening technology, fittings and tools with an installation service for gates and gate drives, head office with warehouse, one branch, 22 employees: management (owner Brenner senior, son Brenner junior), purchasing, eight sales staff, six warehouse staff, two fitters, three administration. Certified since December 2026; the map was taken under time pressure from a template set. It shows 14 processes, including “Development”, “Production”, “Control of measuring equipment”, “Maintenance of machines” and “Calibration” — none of which exist. In the first surveillance audit in 2027: minor nonconformity “map does not correspond to the company; process installation missing”.
What the company does: customers (tradespeople, industry, private customers) buy goods at the counter, order by phone/online shop, goods are picked and delivered or collected; gate drives are installed on request (two fitters, manufacturer specifications); returns and complaints run through sales; purchasing from twelve suppliers, goods receipt in the warehouse; fleet of three vehicles; inventory management in the cloud.
Task (90 minutes):
- Redraw the map (template 01/02): management, value creation (customer → customer), support — only processes that exist; external processes marked.
- Assign an owner (function) and one KPI with target and source to each process.
- Write the process sheets V3 Installation and S4 Returns and complaints (template 04).
- Complete the interface table for sales → warehouse, warehouse → installation, customer → return.
Learning point: of 14 processes, nine remain — and one is added (installation), which never appeared in the template set although it causes the complaints; ten in total. Afterwards the map is the company, not the standard.
Records and maintenance: map with status, process sheets up to date, one hour a year
| Record | Demonstrates |
|---|---|
| Map with status and approval (management), on the notice board | 4.4.1 a), b) — processes and interaction |
| One process sheet per box, status, owner, KPI | 4.4.1 c)–e), 5.3 |
| KPIs per process in the management review (chapter 2) | 4.4.1 g), 9.1.1, 9.3 |
| Risk analysis with “process” column | 4.4.1 f), 6.1 |
| Interface table | 4.4.1 b) |
| Change sheet on change of the map | 6.3 |
Annual maintenance in one hour (date: before the internal audit, in the audit programme): every process owner takes their sheet and checks four things — are the steps still right? Is the record created at every step? Is the KPI collected and is it in the management review? Are the risks up to date? Changes go through the three steps of document control; the quality manager collects the statuses in the document list.
What really changes every year: rarely the map, sometimes an owner (staff change), often a KPI (target value) and two or three steps (new software, new supplier). More change points to a map that was never right.
Procedure in our company
Your company completes this module. The general part of the training ends here; what follows, only your company knows:
| Item | What is recorded |
|---|---|
| Contact person | Who is the quality manager or contact person for quality questions? Who deputises? |
| Documents and templates | Where are the manual, the process sheets and the templates used for this topic (folder, cloud, paper)? |
| Records | Where are the records on this topic filed, and for how long are they kept? |
| Approval | Who approves documents, changes and decisions on this topic? |
| Dates | Which fixed dates apply (internal audit, management review, external audit)? |
Companies with a company account of the Academy receive this module with their own details; participants then see the names, dates and filing locations of their company. Without customisation: ask your management or your quality manager where these details are laid down in your company — usually in the quality manual.
Final test
31 questions, one correct answer each. You need 25 correct answers to pass (80 %). Scoring happens on the server — there is no answer key on this page.
Your result
Certificate on LinkedIn
How helpful was this course?
Should your colleagues take it too?
Pass the course link on – free, no registration. With a company code all certificates end up in the same company account.
What happens next
Have the map and process sheets created for you: Company and process manual from the questionnaire — map, twelve process sheets, swimlanes on request — at a fixed price, in Word.
Next in the series: Courses "Quality Manual in 5 Days", "Procedures and Work Instructions" and "Objectives, Risks and Opportunities" in the QM-Guru Academy.
More free training courses are available in the Online Academy (German). Questions about implementation in your company: use the contact form.
Questions about the content of this training: Holger.grosser@iso9001.info · phone 0911-49522541. Online training fulfils the legal training duty only if you can ask the trainer questions.